The Role of Imagery Ability and Vividness in Achieving Mastery During Imagery Rescripting

Abstract

Imagery Rescripting (ImRs) has received growing attention, but its underlying mechanisms are still to be investigated. Whereas research has proposed mastery to be a potential mediator of intervention efficacy, it is not yet clear which attributes enhance this feeling of mastery. This study aimed to investigate differences between active and passive ImRs in increasing mastery. Additionally, the study investigated whether imagery ability and vividness moderated the effect of ImRs on mastery. After assessing negative autobiographical memories, associated feelings of mastery, and imagery ability, 44 participants were randomly allocated to active or passive ImRs. After ImRs was implemented, ratings of mastery were re-assessed. Results indicated increased mastery right after ImRs and four days after ImRs compared to baseline, irrespective of condition. Neither imagery ability nor vividness moderated the effect of ImRs on mastery at any point. ImRs may be a beneficial intervention in both passive and active form. Results suggest that ImRs might be effective irrespective of imagery ability, but future research with more aphantasic participants is warranted.