Using computational argumentation for explainable chess AI
Publication date
Authors
DOI
Document Type
Master Thesis
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
CC-BY-NC-ND
Abstract
This thesis examines what role the combination of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) and argumentation can play in the explanation of chessendgames. Using the ASPIC+ framework, this thesis tries to enable reasoning about chess endgame positions, specifically king and pawn versus king (KPvK) endgames.